![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
![]() |
The Nature and Importance of Marketing ChannelsComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Few
producers sell their goods directly to the final users. Instead, most
use intermediaries to bring their products to market. They try to forge
a marketing channel (or distribution channel)—a
set of interdependent organizations involved in the process of making a
product or service available for use or consumption by the consumer or
business user.2
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
A
company's channel decisions directly affect every other marketing
decision. The company's pricing depends on whether it works with
national discount chains, uses high-quality specialty stores, or sells
directly to consumers via the Web. The firm's sales force and
communications decisions depend on how much persuasion, training,
motivation, and support its channel partners need. Whether a company
develops or acquires certain new products may depend on how well those
products fit the capabilities of its channel members.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Companies
often pay too little attention to their distribution channels, however,
sometimes with damaging results. In contrast, many companies have used
imaginative distribution systems to gain a competitive
advantage. The creative and imposing distribution system of FedEx made
it a leader in the transportation industry. Dell Computer
revolutionized its industry by selling personal computers directly to
consumers rather than through retail stores. And Charles Schwab &
Company pioneered the delivery of financial services via the Internet.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Distribution
channel decisions often involve long-term commitments to other firms.
For example, companies such as Ford, IBM, or McDonald's can easily
change their advertising, pricing, or promotion programs. They can
scrap old products and introduce new ones as market tastes demand. But
when they set up distribution channels through contracts with
franchisees, independent dealers, or large retailers, they cannot
readily replace these channels with company-owned stores or Web sites
if conditions change. Therefore, management must design its channels
carefully, with an eye on tomorrow's likely selling environment as well
as today's.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
How Channel Members Add ValueComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Why
do producers give some of the selling job to channel partners? After
all, doing so means giving up some control over how and to whom the
products are sold. The use of intermediaries results from their greater
efficiency in making goods available to target markets. Through their
contacts, experience, specialization, and scale of operation,
intermediaries usually offer the firm more than it can achieve on its
own.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Figure
13.1 shows how using intermediaries can provide economies. Figure 13.1A
shows three manufacturers, each using direct marketing to reach three
customers. This system requires nine different contacts. Figure 13.1B
shows the three manufacturers working through one distributor, which
contacts the three customers. This system requires only six contacts.
In this way, intermediaries reduce the amount of work that must be done
by both producers and consumers.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
From
the economic system's point of view, the role of marketing
intermediaries is to transform the assortments of products made by
producers into the assortments wanted by consumers. Producers make
narrow assortments of products in large quantities, but consumers want
broad assortments of products in small quantities. In the marketing
channels, intermediaries buy large quantities from many producers and
break them down into the smaller quantities and broader assortments
wanted by consumers. Thus, intermediaries play an important role in
matching supply and demand.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
In
making products and services available to consumers, channel members
add value by bridging the major time, place, and possession gaps that
separate goods and services from those who would use them. Members of
the marketing channel perform many key functions. Some help to complete
transactions:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Others help to fulfill the completed transactions:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The question is not whether these functions need to be performed—they must be—but rather who
will perform them. To the extent that the manufacturer performs these
functions, its costs go up and its prices have to be higher. When some
of these functions are shifted to intermediaries, the producer's costs
and prices may be lower, but the intermediaries must charge more to
cover the costs of their work. In dividing the work of the channel, the
various functions should be assigned to the channel members who can add
the most value for the cost.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Number of Channel LevelsComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Companies
can design their distribution channels to make products and services
available to customers in different ways. Each layer of marketing
intermediaries that performs some work in bringing the product and its
ownership closer to the final buyer is a channel level. Because the producer and the final consumer both perform some work, they are part of every channel.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The number of intermediary levels indicates the length of a channel. Figure 13.2A shows several consumer distribution channels of different lengths. Channel 1, called a direct marketing channel,
has no intermediary levels; the company sells directly to consumers.
For example, Avon, Amway, and Tupperware sell their products
door-to-door, through home and office sales parties, and on the Web;
L.L. Bean sells clothing direct through mail catalogs, by telephone,
and online; and a university sells education on its campus or through
distance learning. The remaining channels in Figure 13.2A are indirect marketing channels, containing one or more intermediaries.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Figure
13.2B shows some common business distribution channels. The business
marketer can use its own sales force to sell directly to business
customers. Or it can sell to various types of intermediaries, who in
turn sell to these customers. Consumer and business marketing channels
with even more levels are sometimes found, but less often. From the
producer's point of view, a greater number of levels means less control
and greater channel complexity. Moreover, all of the institutions in
the channel are connected by several types of flows. These include the physical flow of products, the flow of ownership, the payment flow, the information flow, and the promotion flow. These flows can make even channels with only one or a few levels very complex.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|