![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
![]() |
Integrated Marketing CommunicationsComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
During
the past several decades, companies around the world have perfected the
art of mass marketing—selling highly standardized products to masses of
customers. In the process, they have developed effective mass-media
advertising techniques to support their mass-marketing strategies.
These companies routinely invest millions of dollars in the mass media,
reaching tens of millions of customers with a single ad. However, as we
move into the twenty-first century, marketing managers face some new
marketing communications realities.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The Changing Communications EnvironmentComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Two
major factors are changing the face of today's marketing
communications. First, as mass markets have fragmented, marketers are
shifting away from mass marketing. More and more, they are developing
focused marketing programs designed to build closer relationships with
customers in more narrowly defined micromarkets. Second, vast
improvements in information technology are speeding the movement toward
segmented marketing. Today's information technology helps marketers to
keep closer track of customer needs—more information about consumers at
the individual and household levels is available than ever before. New
technologies also provide new communications avenues for reaching
smaller customer segments with more-tailored messages.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The
shift from mass marketing to segmented marketing has had a dramatic
impact on marketing communications. Just as mass marketing gave rise to
a new generation of mass-media communications, the shift toward
one-to-one marketing is spawning a new generation of more specialized
and highly targeted communications efforts.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Given
this new communications environment, marketers must rethink the roles
of various media and promotion mix tools. Mass-media advertising has
long dominated the promotion mixes of consumer product companies.
However, although television, magazines, and other mass media remain
very important, their dominance is now declining. Market fragmentation has resulted in media
fragmentation—in an explosion of more-focused media that better match
today's targeting strategies. Beyond the traditional mass-media
channels, advertisers are making increased use of new, highly targeted
media, ranging from highly focused specialty magazines and cable
television channels, to CD catalogs and Web coupon promotions, to
airport kiosks and floor decals in supermarket aisles. In all,
companies are doing less broadcasting and more narrowcasting.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The Need for Integrated Marketing CommunicationsComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The
shift from mass marketing to targeted marketing, and the corresponding
use of a larger, richer mix of communication channels and promotion
tools, poses a problem for marketers. Customers don't distinguish
between message sources the way marketers do. In the consumer's mind,
advertising messages from different media and different promotional
approaches all become part of a single message about the company.
Conflicting messages from these different sources can result in
confused company images and brand positions.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
All
too often, companies fail to integrate their various communications
channels. The result is a hodgepodge of communications to consumers.
Mass-media advertisements say one thing, a price promotion sends a
different signal, a product label creates still another message,
company sales literature says something altogether different, and the
company's Web site seems out of sync with everything else.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The
problem is that these communications often come from different company
sources. Advertising messages are planned and implemented by the
advertising department or advertising agency. Personal selling
communications are developed by sales management. Other functional
specialists are responsible for public relations, sales promotion,
direct marketing, online sites, and other forms of marketing
communications.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Recently,
such functional separation has been a major problem for many companies
and their Internet communications. Many companies first organized their
new Web communications operations into separate groups or divisions,
isolating them from mainstream marketing activities. However, whereas
some companies have compartmentalized the new communications tools,
customers won't. According to one IMC expert:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
The
truth is, most [consumers] won't compartmentalize their use of the new
systems. They won't say, "Hey, I'm going off to do a bit of Web
surfing. Burn my TV, throw out all my radios, cancel all my magazine
subscriptions and, by the way, take out my telephone and don't deliver
any mail anymore." It's not that kind of world for consumers, and it
shouldn't be that kind of world for marketers either.3 Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
To
be sure, the Internet promises exciting marketing communications
potential. However, marketers trying to use the Web alone to build
brands face many challenges. One limitation is that the Internet
doesn't build mass brand awareness. Instead, it's like having millions
of private conversations. The Web simply can't match the impact of the
Super Bowl, where tens of millions of people see the same 30-second
Nike or Hallmark ad at the same time. Using the Internet, it's hard to
establish the universal meanings—such as "Just Do It!" or "When you
care enough to send the very best"—that are at the heart of brand
recognition and brand value.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Thus, if treated as a special case, the Internet—or any other marketing communication tool—can be a disintegrating
force in marketing communications. Instead, all the communication tools
must be carefully integrated into the broader marketing communications
mix. Today, the best bet is to wed the emotional pitch and impact of
traditional brand marketing with the interactivity and real service
offered online. For example, television ads for Saturn still offer the
same old-fashioned humorous appeal. But now they point viewers to the
company's Web site, which offers lots of help and very little hype. The
site helps serious car buyers select a model, calculate payments, and
find a retailer online.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Even
marketers that can't really sell their goods via the Web are using the
Internet as an effective customer communication and relationship
enhancer. For example, Harpo Enterprises, the company that oversees The Oprah Winfrey Show, also maintains a Web site (www.oprah.com)
that offers in-depth information on show topics, access to footage
taped after the live show ends, and a sneek peek at the content of
upcoming issues of O magazine. The Web site, show, and
magazine are all consistently designed. Says one analyst, the
"consistency in design and tone makes the brand stronger because the
consumer immediately recognizes the image, which engenders emotion and
brand loyalty."4
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
In
the past, no one person or department was responsible for thinking
through the communication roles of the various promotion tools and
coordinating the promotion mix. Today, however, more companies are
adopting the concept of integrated marketing communications (IMC).
Under this concept, as illustrated in Figure 15.1, the company
carefully integrates and coordinates its many communications channels
to deliver a clear, consistent, and compelling message about the
organization and its products.5
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
As
one marketing executive puts it, "IMC builds a strong brand identity in
the marketplace by tying together and reinforcing all your images and
messages. IMC means that all your corporate messages, positioning and
images, and identity are coordinated across all [marketing
communications] venues. It means that your PR materials say the same
thing as your direct-mail campaign, and your advertising has the same
'look and feel' as your Web site."6
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
IMC calls for recognizing all contact points where the customer may encounter the company, its products, and its brands. Each brand contact
will deliver a message, whether good, bad, or indifferent. The company
must strive to deliver a consistent and positive message at all contact
points.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
To help implement integrated marketing communications, some companies appoint a marketing communications director—or marcom manager—who
has overall responsibility for the company's communications efforts.
Integrated marketing communications produces better communications
consistency and greater sales impact. It places the responsibility in
someone's hands—where none existed before—to unify the company's image
as it is shaped by thousands of company activities. It leads to a total
marketing communication strategy aimed at showing how the company and
its products can help customers solve their problems.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|