![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
![]() |
Pricing
decisions are subject to an incredibly complex array of environmental
and competitive forces. A company sets not a single price, but rather a
pricing structure that covers different items in its line.
This pricing structure changes over time as products move through their
life cycles. The company adjusts product prices to reflect changes in
costs and demand and to account for variations in buyers and
situations. As the competitive environment changes, the company
considers when to initiate price changes and when to respond to them.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
This chapter examines the major dynamic pricing strategies available to marketers. In turn, we look at new-product pricing strategies for products in the introductory stage of the product life cycle, product mix pricing strategies for related products in the product mix, price adjustment strategies that account for customer differences and changing situations, and strategies for initiating and responding to price changes.2
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
New-Product Pricing StrategiesComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Pricing
strategies usually change as the product passes through its life cycle.
The introductory stage is especially challenging. Companies bringing
out a new product face the challenge of setting prices for the first
time. They can choose between two broad strategies: market-skimming pricing and market-penetration pricing.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Market-Skimming PricingComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Many
companies that invent new products initially set high prices to "skim"
revenues layer by layer from the market. Sony frequently uses this
strategy, called market-skimming pricing.
When Sony introduced the world's first high-definition television
(HDTV) to the Japanese market in 1990, the high-tech sets cost $43,000.
These televisions were purchased only by customers who could afford to
pay a high price for the new technology. Sony rapidly reduced the price
over the next several years to attract new buyers. By 1993 a 28-inch
HDTV cost a Japanese buyer just over $6,000. In 2001, a Japanese
consumer could buy a 40-inch HDTV for about $2,000, a price that many
more customers could afford. HDTV sets now sell for about $3,000 in the
United States, and "HDTV-ready" sets sell for about $1,500. In this
way, Sony skimmed the maximum amount of revenue from the various
segments of the market.3
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Market
skimming makes sense only under certain conditions. First, the
product's quality and image must support its higher price, and enough
buyers must want the product at that price. Second, the costs of
producing a smaller volume cannot be so high that they cancel the
advantage of charging more. Finally, competitors should not be able to
enter the market easily and undercut the high price.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Market-Penetration PricingComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Rather than setting a high initial price to skim off small but profitable market segments, some companies use market-penetration pricing. They set a low initial price in order to penetrate
the market quickly and deeply—to attract a large number of buyers
quickly and win a large market share. The high sales volume results in
falling costs, allowing the company to cut its price even further. For
example, Dell used penetration pricing to enter the personal computer
market, selling high-quality computer products through lower-cost
direct channels. Its sales soared when IBM, Apple, and other
competitors selling through retail stores could not match its prices.
Wal-Mart and other discount retailers also use penetration pricing.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Several
conditions must be met for this low-price strategy to work. First, the
market must be highly price sensitive so that a low price produces more
market growth. Second, production and distribution costs must fall as
sales volume increases. Finally, the low price must help keep out the
competition, and the penetration pricer must maintain its low-price
position—otherwise, the price advantage may be only temporary. For
example, Dell faced difficult times when IBM and other competitors
established their own direct distribution channels. However, through
its dedication to low production and distribution costs, Dell has
retained its price advantage and established itself as the industry's
number one personal computer maker.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||
|