![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Competitive StrategiesComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Having
identified and evaluated its major competitors, the company now must
design broad competitive marketing strategies by which it can gain
competitive advantage by offering superior customer value. But what
broad marketing strategies might the company use? Which ones are best
for a particular company, or for the company's different divisions and
products?
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Approaches to Marketing StrategyComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
No
one strategy is best for all companies. Each company must determine
what makes the most sense given its position in the industry and its
objectives, opportunities, and resources. Even within a company,
different strategies may be required for different businesses or
products. Johnson & Johnson uses one marketing strategy for its
leading brands in stable consumer markets and a different marketing
strategy for its new high-tech health care businesses and products.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Companies
also differ in how they approach the strategy-planning process. Many
large firms develop formal competitive marketing strategies and
implement them religiously. However, other companies develop strategy
in a less formal and orderly fashion. A recent book, Radical Marketing,
praises companies such as Harley-Davidson, Virgin Atlantic Airways, and
Boston Beer for succeeding by breaking many of the "rules" of marketing
strategy.9
Such companies don't operate large marketing departments, conduct
expensive marketing research, spell out formal and elaborate
competitive strategies, and spend huge sums on advertising and selling.
Instead, they sketch out strategies on the fly, stretch their limited
resources, live close to their customers, and create more-satisfying
solutions to customer needs. They form buyer's clubs, use buzz
marketing, and focus on delivering high product quality and winning
long-term customer loyalty. It seems that not all marketing must follow
in the footsteps of marketing giants such as IBM and Procter &
Gamble.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
In
fact, approaches to marketing strategy and practice often pass through
three stages: entrepreneurial marketing, formulated marketing, and
intrepreneurial marketing.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
The
bottom line is that there are many approaches to developing effective
competitive marketing strategy. There will be a constant tension
between the formulated side of marketing and the creative side. It is
easier to learn the formulated side of marketing, which has occupied
most of our attention in this book. But we have also seen how marketing
creativity and passion in the strategies of many of the company's we've
studied—whether small or large, new or mature—have helped to build and
maintain success in the marketplace. With this in mind, we now look at
broad competitive marketing strategies companies can use.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Basic Competitive StrategiesComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
More
than two decades ago, Michael Porter suggested four basic competitive
positioning strategies that companies can follow—three winning
strategies and one losing one.10 The three winning strategies include:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Overall cost leadership: Here
the company works hard to achieve the lowest production and
distribution costs. Low costs let it price lower than its competitors
and win a large market share. Texas Instruments, Dell Computer, and
Wal-Mart are leading practitioners of this strategy. Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Differentiation: Here
the company concentrates on creating a highly differentiated product
line and marketing program so that it comes across as the class leader
in the industry. Most customers would prefer to own this brand if its
price is not too high. IBM and Caterpillar follow this strategy in
information technology products and services and heavy construction
equipment, respectively. Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Focus: Here
the company focuses its effort on serving a few market segments well
rather than going after the whole market. For example, Ritz-Carlton
focuses on the top 5 percent of corporate and leisure travelers.
Glassmaker AFG Industries focuses on users of tempered and colored
glass. It makes 70 percent of the glass for microwave oven doors and 75
percent of the glass for shower doors and patio tabletops. Similarly,
Hohner owns a stunning 85 percent of the harmonica market. Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Companies
that pursue a clear strategy—one of the above—will likely perform well.
The firm that carries out that strategy best will make the most
profits. But firms that do not pursue a clear strategy—middle-of-the-roaders—do
the worst. Sears, Holiday Inn, and Kmart encountered difficult times
because they did not stand out as the lowest in cost, highest in
perceived value, or best in serving some market segment.
Middle-of-the-roaders try to be good on all strategic counts, but end
up being not very good at anything.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
More
recently, two marketing consultants, Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema,
offered a new classification of competitive marketing strategies.11
They suggest that companies gain leadership positions by delivering
superior value to their customers. Companies can pursue any of three
strategies—called value disciplines—for delivering superior customer value. These are:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Operational excellence: The
company provides superior value by leading its industry in price and
convenience. It works to reduce costs and to create a lean and
efficient value delivery system. It serves customers who want reliable,
good-quality products or services, but who want them cheaply and
easily. Examples include Wal-Mart, Southwest Airlines, and Dell
Computer. Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Customer intimacy: The
company provides superior value by precisely segmenting its markets and
tailoring its products or services to match exactly the needs of
targeted customers. It specializes in satisfying unique customer needs
through a close relationship with and intimate knowledge of the
customer. It builds detailed customer databases for segmenting and
targeting, and empowers its marketing people to respond quickly to
customer needs. Customer-intimate companies serve customers who are
willing to pay a premium to get precisely what they want. They will do
almost anything to build long-term customer loyalty and to capture
customer lifetime value. Examples include Nordstrom, Sony, Lexus,
American Express, and British Airways. Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Product leadership: The
company provides superior value by offering a continuous stream of
leading-edge products or services. It aims to make its own and
competing products obsolete. Product leaders are open to new ideas,
relentlessly pursue new solutions, and work to get new products to
market quickly. They serve customers who want state-of-the-art products
and services, regardless of the costs in terms of price or
inconvenience. Examples include Intel, Motorola, and Microsoft. Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Some
companies successfully pursue more than one value discipline at the
same time. For example, FedEx excels at both operational excellence and
customer intimacy. However, such companies are rare—few firms can be
the best at more than one of these disciplines. By trying to be good at all of the value disciplines, a company usually ends up being best at none.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Treacy
and Wiersema have found that leading companies focus on and excel at a
single value discipline, while meeting industry standards on the other
two. Such companies design their entire value delivery network to
single-mindedly support the chosen discipline. For example, Wal-Mart
knows that customer intimacy and product leadership are important.
Compared with other discounters, such as Kmart, it offers very good
customer service and an excellent product assortment. Still, it offers
less customer service and less product depth than do Nordstrom, Eddie
Bauer, or The Sharper Image, which pursue customer intimacy. Instead,
Wal-Mart focuses obsessively on operational excellence—on reducing
costs and streamlining its order-to-delivery process in order to make
it convenient for customers to buy just the right products at the
lowest prices.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Classifying
competitive strategies as value disciplines is appealing. It defines
marketing strategy in terms of the single-minded pursuit of delivering
superior value to customers. Each value discipline defines a specific
way to build lasting customer relationships.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Competitive PositionsComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Firms
competing in a given target market, at any point in time, differ in
their objectives and resources. Some firms are large, others small.
Some have many resources, others are strapped for funds. Some are old
and established, others new and fresh. Some strive for rapid market
share growth, others for long-term profits. And the firms occupy
different competitive positions in the target market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
We
now examine competitive strategies based on the roles firms play in the
target market—leader, challenger, follower, or nicher. Suppose that an
industry contains the firms shown in Figure 18.3. Forty percent of the
market is in the hands of the market leader, the firm with the largest market share. Another 30 percent is in the hands of market challengers, runner-up firms that are fighting hard to increase their market share. Another 20 percent is in the hands of market followers, other runner-up firms that want to hold their share without rocking the boat. The remaining 10 percent is in the hands of market nichers, firms that serve small segments not being pursued by other firms.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Table 18.1 shows specific marketing strategies that are available to market leaders, challengers, followers, and nichers.12
Remember, however, that these classifications often do not apply to a
whole company, but only to its position in a specific industry. Large
companies such as IBM, Microsoft, Procter & Gamble, or Disney might
be leaders in some markets and nichers in others. For example, Procter
& Gamble leads in many segments, such as dishwashing and laundry
detergents, disposable diapers, and shampoo. But it challenges Lever in
the hand soaps and Kimberly-Clark in facial tissues. Such companies
often use different strategies for different business units or
products, depending on the competitive situations of each.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Market Leader StrategiesComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Most
industries contain an acknowledged market leader. The leader has the
largest market share and usually leads the other firms in price
changes, new-product introductions, distribution coverage, and
promotion spending. The leader may or may not be admired or respected,
but other firms concede its dominance. Competitors focus on the leader
as a company to challenge, imitate, or avoid. Some of the best-known
market leaders are Wal-Mart (retailing), General Motors (autos), IBM
(computers and information technology services), Caterpillar
(earth-moving equipment), Coca-Cola (soft drinks), McDonald's (fast
food), Nike (athletic footwear), and Gillette (razors and blades).
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
A
leader's life is not easy. It must maintain a constant watch. Other
firms keep challenging its strengths or trying to take advantage of its
weaknesses. The market leader can easily miss a turn in the market and
plunge into second or third place. A product innovation may come along
and hurt the leader (as when Nokia's and Ericsson's digital phones took
the lead from Motorola's analog models). The leader might grow arrogant
or complacent and misjudge the competition (as when Sears lost its lead
to Wal-Mart). Or the leader might look old-fashioned against new and
peppier rivals (as when Levi's lost serious ground to more current or
stylish brands like Gap, Tommy Hilfiger, DKNY, or Guess).
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
To
remain number one, leading firms can take any of three actions. First,
they can find ways to expand total demand. Second, they can protect
their current market share through good defensive and offensive
actions. Third, they can try to expand their market share further, even
if market size remains constant.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Expanding the Total DemandComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
The
leading firm normally gains the most when the total market expands. If
Americans take more pictures, Kodak stands to gain the most because it
sells more than 80 percent of this country's film. If Kodak can
convince more Americans to take pictures, or to take pictures on more
occasions, or to take more pictures on each occasion, it will benefit
greatly.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Market leaders can expand the market by developing new users, new uses, and more usage of its products. They usually can find new users
in many places. For example, Revlon might find new perfume users in its
current markets by convincing women who do not use perfume to try it.
It might find users in new demographic segments, such as by producing
fragrances for men. Or it might expand into new geographic segments,
perhaps by selling its fragrances in other countries.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Marketers can expand markets by discovering and promoting new uses
for the product. For example, Intel invests heavily to develop new PC,
networking, and telecommunications applications, which in turn
increases the demand for microprocessors. It knows that it will get a
large share of the new microprocessor business. Another example of
new-use expansion is Arm & Hammer baking soda, whose sales had
flattened after 125 years. Then the company discovered that consumers
were using baking soda as a refrigerator deodorizer. It launched a
heavy advertising and publicity campaign focusing on this use and
persuaded consumers in half of America's homes to place an open box of
baking soda in their refrigerators and to replace it every few months.
Today, its Web site (www.armandhammer.com)
regularly features new uses, from removing residue left behind by
hair-styling products and sweetening garbage disposals, laundry
hampers, refrigerators, and trash cans to creating a home spa in your
bathroom. Similarly, The WD-40 Company collected user suggestions and
sponsored contests to uncover new uses for its all-purpose lubricant,
making WD-40 one of the truly essential survival items in most American
homes.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Finally, market leaders can encourage more usage
by convincing people to use the product more often or to use more per
occasion. For example, Campbell urges people to eat soup more often by
running ads containing new recipes. It also offers a toll-free hot line
(1-888-MM-MM-GOOD), staffed by live "recipe representatives" who offer
recipes to last-minute cooks at a loss for meal ideas. And the
Campbell's Kitchen section of the company's Web site (www.cambellsoup.com)
lets visitors search for or exchange recipes, set up their own personal
recipe box, and even sign up for a daily or weekly Meal Mail program.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Protecting Market ShareComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
While
trying to expand total market size, the leading firm also must protect
its current business against competitors' attacks. Coca-Cola must also
constantly guard against Pepsi; Gillette against Bic; Wal-Mart against
Target; and McDonald's against Wendy's.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
What
can the market leader do to protect its position? First, it must
prevent or fix weaknesses that provide opportunities for competitors.
It must always fulfill its value promise. Its prices must remain
consistent with the value that customers see in the brand. It must work
tirelessly to keep strong relationships with valued customers. The
leader should "plug holes" so that competitors do not jump in. But the
best defense is a good offense, and the best response is continuous innovation.
The leader refuses to be content with the way things are and leads the
industry in new products, customer services, distribution
effectiveness, and cost cutting. It keeps increasing its competitive
effectiveness and value to customers.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
For
example, International Game Technology (IGT) manufactures slot machines
and video poker machines for casinos around the world. It has achieved
the daunting 75 percent market share in its mature market. Unlike the
people who use its products, IGT doesn't rely on luck. Instead, it has
formed partnerships with both casino operators and competitive gaming
manufacturers to develop innovative new equipment to replace the old.
IGT spends aggressively on R&D, allocating $31 million annually to
create new games. "We know months, years, in advance what our customers
want," says Robert Shay, a sales director for IGT. In this way, IGT
takes the offensive, sets the pace, and exploits competitors'
weaknesses.13
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
EXPANDING MARKET SHARE Market
leaders also can grow by increasing their market shares further. In
many markets, small market share increases mean very large sales
increases. For example, in the coffee market, a 1 percent increase in
market share is worth $48 million; in soft drinks, $500 million!
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Studies
have shown that, on average, profitability rises with increasing market
share. Because of these findings, many companies have sought expanded
market shares to improve profitability. General Electric, for example,
declared that it wants to be at least number one or two in each of its
markets or else get out. GE shed its computer, air-conditioning,
small-appliances, and television businesses because it could not
achieve top-dog position in these industries.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
However,
some studies have found that many industries contain one or a few
highly profitable large firms, several profitable and more focused
firms, and a large number of medium-sized firms with poorer profit
performance. It appears that profitability increases as a business
gains share relative to competitors in its served market. For
example, Lexus holds only a small share of the total car market, but it
earns high profit because it is a high-share company in its
luxury-performance car segment. And it has achieved this high share in
its served market because it does other things right, such as producing
high quality, giving good service, and building close customer
relationships.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Companies
must not think, however, that gaining increased market share will
improve profitability automatically. Much depends on their strategy for
gaining increased share. There are many high-share companies with low
profitability and many low-share companies with high profitability. The
cost of buying higher market share may far exceed the returns. Higher
shares tend to produce higher profits only when unit costs fall with
increased market share, or when the company offers a superior-quality
product and charges a premium price that more than covers the cost of
offering higher quality.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Market Challenger StrategiesComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Firms
that are second, third, or lower in an industry are sometimes quite
large, such as Colgate, Ford, Target, Avis, and Pepsi. These runner-up
firms can adopt one of two competitive strategies: They can challenge
the leader and other competitors in an aggressive bid for more market
share (market challengers). Or they can play along with competitors and
not rock the boat (market followers).
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
A
market challenger must first define which competitors to challenge and
its strategic objective. The challenger can attack the market leader.
This is a high-risk but potentially high-gain strategy that makes good
sense if the leader is not serving the market well. To succeed with
such an attack, a company must have some sustainable competitive
advantage over the leader. This might be a cost advantage leading to
lower prices or the ability to provide better value at a premium price.
If the company goes after the market leader, its objective may be to
wrest a certain market share. Bic knows that it can't topple Gillette
in the razor market—it simply wants a larger share. Or the challenger's
goal might be to take over market leadership. Wal-Mart began as a
nicher in small towns in the Southwest, grew rapidly to challenge
market leader Sears, and finally assumed market leadership, all within
a span of less than 25 years.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Alternatively,
the challenger can avoid the leader and instead challenge firms its own
size, or smaller local and regional firms. These smaller firms may be
underfinanced and not serving their customers well. Several of the
major beer companies grew to their present size not by challenging
large competitors, but by gobbling up small local or regional
competitors. If the company goes after a small local company, its
objective may be to put that company out of business. The important
point remains: The challenger must choose its opponents carefully and
have a clearly defined and attainable objective.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
How can the market challenger best attack the chosen competitor and achieve its strategic objectives? It may launch a full frontal attack,
matching the competitor's product, advertising, price, and distribution
efforts. It attacks the competitor's strengths rather than its
weaknesses. The outcome depends on who has the greater strength and
endurance. If the market challenger has fewer resources than the
competitor, a frontal attack makes little sense. For example, the
runner-up razor-blade manufacturer in Brazil attacked Gillette, the
market leader. The attacker was asked if it offered the consumer a
better razor blade. "No," was the reply. "A lower price?" "No." "A
better package?" "No." "A clever advertising campaign?" "No." "Better
allowances to the trade?" "No." "Then how do you expect to take share
away from Gillette?" "Sheer determination" was the reply. Needless to
say, the offensive failed. Even great size and strength may not be
enough to challenge a firmly entrenched, resourceful competitor
successfully.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Rather than challenging head-on, the challenger can make an indirect attack
on the competitor's weaknesses or on gaps in the competitor's market
coverage. For example, Dell Computer found a foothold against giant IBM
in the personal computer market by selling directly to consumers.
Southwest Airlines challenged American and other large carriers by
serving the overlooked short-haul, no-frills commuter segment. Such
indirect challenges make good sense when the company has fewer
resources than the competitor.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Market Follower StrategiesComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Not
all runner-up companies want to challenge the market leader. Challenges
are never taken lightly by the leader. If the challenger's lure is
lower prices, improved service, or additional product features, the
leader can quickly match these to defuse the attack. The leader
probably has more staying power in an all-out battle for customers. For
example, Kmart recently launched a renewed low-price "BlueLight
Special" campaign challenging Wal-Mart's everyday low prices. However,
given its lower costs and greater resources, Wal-Mart had little
trouble fending off Kmart's challenge, leaving Kmart worse off for the
attempt. Thus, many firms prefer to follow rather than challenge the
leader.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Similarly,
after years of challenging Procter & Gamble unsuccessfully in the
U.S. laundry detergent market, Unilever recently decided to throw in
the towel and become a follower instead. P&G, which captures a 57
percent share of the market versus Unilever's 17 percent share, has
outmuscled competitors on every front. For example, it spends more than
$100 million a year on advertising for Tide alone, and has battered
competitors with a relentless stream of new and improved products.
Unilever is now cutting prices and promotion on its detergents to focus
on profit rather than market share.14
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
A
follower can gain many advantages. The market leader often bears the
huge expenses of developing new products and markets, expanding
distribution, and educating the market. By contrast, the market
follower can learn from the leader's experience. It can copy or improve
on the leader's products and programs, usually with much less
investment. Although the follower will probably not overtake the
leader, it often can be as profitable. A good example of a follower is
Dial Corporation, maker of such well-known brands as Dial, Tone, and
Pure&Natural hand soaps, Armour Star canned meats, Purex laundry
products, and Renuzit air fresheners. Throughout the 1990s, Dial
pursued a "fast follow" strategy:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Flashy it isn't. "We want to be the dullest story in America," declares Dial's CEO… . Dial doesn't spend zillions to make its offerings household names across the nation. Instead, Dial prefers to coast in the slipstream of giant rivals, such as Procter & Gamble… . Instead of spending big on research and development or marketing, Dial leaves it to others… . And Dial lets other companies educate consumers about new products. P&G, for instance, introduced concentrated powder detergents in 1990. Dial followed over a year later with its own concentrated version, Purex—priced as much as one-third lower than P&G's Tide. Despite this low profile, the company does well in its markets. For example, Dial soap is America's number one antibacterial soap, and Purex has staked out a leadership position in the value segment of the laundry detergent market. Renuzit is the nation's number two air freshener brand, and Amour Star is number two in canned meats.15 Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Following
is not the same as being passive or a carbon copy of the leader. For
example, in recent years, follower Dial's has focused on being "first,
fresh, and fast to market" with innovative new brand extensions such as
Dial Complete and Renuzit Super Odor Neutralizer. A market follower
must know how to hold current customers and win a fair share of new
ones. It must find the right balance between following closely enough
to win customers from the market leader but following at enough of a
distance to avoid retaliation. Each follower tries to bring distinctive
advantages to its target market—location, services, financing. The
follower is often a major target of attack by challengers. Therefore,
the market follower must keep its manufacturing costs low and its
product quality and services high. It must also enter new markets as
they open up.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Market Nicher StrategiesComments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Almost
every industry includes firms that specialize in serving market niches.
Instead of pursuing the whole market, or even large segments, these
firms target subsegments. Nichers are often smaller firms with limited
resources. But smaller divisions of larger firms also may pursue
niching strategies. Firms with low shares of the total market can be
highly profitable through smart niching. For example, you've probably
never heard of McDonald's competitor Jollibee. In terms of global
market share, Jollibee is a mouse among the elephants. But in its
niche, the Philippines, Jollibee captures a 75 percent share of
hamburger market and 53 percent of the fast-food market as a whole.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Why
is niching profitable? The main reason is that the market nicher ends
up knowing the target customer group so well that it meets their needs
better than other firms that casually sell to this niche. As a result,
the nicher can charge a substantial markup over costs because of the
added value. Whereas the mass marketer achieves high volume, the nicher achieves high margins.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Nichers
try to find one or more market niches that are safe and profitable. An
ideal market niche is big enough to be profitable and has growth
potential. It is one that the firm can serve effectively. Perhaps most
importantly, the niche is of little interest to major competitors. And
the firm can build the skills and customer goodwill to defend itself
against a major competitor as the niche grows and becomes more
attractive. Here are just a few examples of profitable nichers:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Logitech has become a $944 million global success story by focusing on human interface devices—computer mice, game controllers, keyboards, PC video cameras, and others. It makes every variation of computer mouse imaginable. Logitech turns out mice for left- and right-handed people, wireless mice, mice shaped like real mice for children, and 3-D mice that let the user appear to move behind screen objects. Breeding computer mice has been so successful that Logitech dominates the world market, with Microsoft as its runner-up. This year, Logitech had its best year ever. Revenues were up 28 percent and profits soared 66 percent.16 Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
The First Commerce Bank in Charlotte, North Carolina, opened its doors in 1996 with a laser focus on serving the banking needs of small- to mid-size businesses. It offered extended business hours, Internet banking for cash management, and a courier service for daily pick-up of noncash deposits from small-business clients, most of whom have few employees and prefer to remain in the office. Early ads focused on First Commerce's small size and more personalized service, building on the insecurities that small-business owners have in dealing with large banks. One ad showed a huge tower with a headline that read, "Your loan application is in there somewhere." In just five years, First Commerce Bank grew from $1 million to $131 million in assets with three branches, no small accomplishment in a city filled with large national banks. The U.S. Small Business Administration recently named First Commerce the top community bank in North Carolina. "The big banks in Charlotte were so focused on [bigger game] that we've picked up some of their business," says CEO Wes Sturges. "Their crumbs are tasty morsels for us."17 Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
The
key idea in niching is specialization. A market nicher can specialize
along any of several market, customer, product, or marketing mix lines.
For example, it can specialize in serving one type of end user, as when a law firm specializes in the criminal, civil, or business law markets. The nicher can specialize in serving a given customer-size group. Many nichers, such as First Commerce Bank, specialize in serving small customers who are neglected by the majors.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Some nichers focus on one or a few specific customers, selling their entire output to a single company, such as Wal-Mart or General Motors. Still other nichers specialize by geographic market, selling only in a certain locality, region, or area of the world. Quality–price
nichers operate at the low or high end of the market. For example,
Hewlett-Packard specializes in the high-quality, high-price end of the
hand-calculator market. Finally, service nichers offer
services not available from other firms. An example is a bank that
takes loan requests over the phone and hand-delivers the money to the
customer.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Niching
carries some major risks. For example, the market niche may dry up, or
it might grow to the point that it attracts larger competitors. That is
why many companies practice multiple niching. By developing
two or more niches, a company increases its chances for survival. Even
some large firms prefer a multiple niche strategy to serving the total
market. For example, Alberto Culver is a $2.5 billion company that has
used a multiple niching strategy to grow profitably without incurring
the wrath of the market leader. CEO Howard Bernick explains the Alberto
Culver philosophy this way: "We know who we are and, perhaps more
importantly, we know who we are not. We know that if we try to
out-Procter Procter, we will fall flat on our face." Instead, the
company known mainly for its Alberto VO5 hair products has focused its
marketing muscle on acquiring a stable of smaller niche brands. Its
other items include flavor enhancers Molly McButter and Mrs. Dash,
static-cling fighter Static Guard, and Consort men's hairspray. Each of
these brands is number one in its niche.18
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Comments by Dr. Laukamm
Add/Edit Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|